Drs. Anwar, MM
Associate Librarian Cereals Research Institute, Maros
Associate Librarian Cereals Research Institute, Maros
Introduction
The ability of a librarian in a paper describing the work record and is one of the librarians are extremely important product for the development of library activities in the present and future. Therefore, for menganlisa a work to obtain a good or perfect predicate in general not be written at a time but many times with different inputs for the improvement of the various parties, especially the librarian who was associate librarian positions and above will or will not be required to make the work written as a prerequisite for advancement kejenjang higher. In addition, activity analysis / criticism of librarianship should continue to be nurtured and developed reading culture and the ability of librarians to submit their opinions and thoughts are well developed because it is in accordance with the current development of the Indonesian people are very put democratization and openness. Where note that the library is an information center, recreation in addition to more easily generate interest in reading.
These will be presented a description of the analytical / critical librarianship to do a librarian al:
The ability of a librarian in a paper describing the work record and is one of the librarians are extremely important product for the development of library activities in the present and future. Therefore, for menganlisa a work to obtain a good or perfect predicate in general not be written at a time but many times with different inputs for the improvement of the various parties, especially the librarian who was associate librarian positions and above will or will not be required to make the work written as a prerequisite for advancement kejenjang higher. In addition, activity analysis / criticism of librarianship should continue to be nurtured and developed reading culture and the ability of librarians to submit their opinions and thoughts are well developed because it is in accordance with the current development of the Indonesian people are very put democratization and openness. Where note that the library is an information center, recreation in addition to more easily generate interest in reading.
These will be presented a description of the analytical / critical librarianship to do a librarian al:
Understanding Analysis
Analysis / critique the work of librarian is reading and
analyzing works of other people either in writing or other recorded information
created in the form of a new paper in the form of review / critique /
suggestions / feedback to refine the work.
Guidelines for Analysis / Critique
In making the analysis / critique the work of
librarianship is essentially an attempt to provide input to the work of someone
meyempurnakan. To be able to produce a good critique, one librarian should use
an assessment instrument in a work that can be guided and emulated by other
professions. Periodic evaluation of the scientific instruments are issued in
cooperation of Higher Education, LIPI and other related institutions may be one
of the guidelines within which have been raised several important issues that
can be used to assess a work as follows:
1. Title
Short and clear so easy to remember. Long title of the
work will be difficult for readers to recognize and remember the work.
a. Highlight areas of science and not the name of the
institution or the city. Science should be more highlighted than others such as
names and other institutions.
b. There is harmony between the title of the science contained in it. Often the case of a work does not have a high relevance of the title to the content.
b. There is harmony between the title of the science contained in it. Often the case of a work does not have a high relevance of the title to the content.
2. Institutional publishers
a. Publishers should be incorporated so as to provide legal guarantees for the work published.
b. Institutionalize national and international standardization in particular relating to the ISSN and ISBN. ISO rules, SNI and the like should be one consideration that the work is less than perfect.
3. Editor
a. Whether the work was prepared by
yourself or other people who come to check (referee,
editor) before publication. Moreover many people's
minds in the field is essary
to perfect a work.
b. If someone else is checked, whether the relevant qualifications and experience in that field. (because the expertise is not because of his position or rank).
b. If someone else is checked, whether the relevant qualifications and experience in that field. (because the expertise is not because of his position or rank).
4. Stability
performance
a. How to layout, type fonts, type of paper, numbering system, and others. Walalupun this seems simple, but its effect on the legibility of a work is crucial.
b. What about his appearance does have a familiar sign of quite attractive (eye catching) so it stands out if stored in a collection of other works. It is usually associated with a color cover, enticing designs, giving rise to the general impression of stability.
5. style of writing
Included in the style of writing is a
systematic way of writing, consistency pembaban, presentation
drawings and tables,
how pengacuan and
citations and bibliography
preparation.
All of these must follow the
prescribed rules if
the work is to achieve
a certain level of qualification.
6. The
substance
Some things to
note about the substance of
a work.
a. Coverage of scientific fields, especially if the work is to discuss a particular scientific topic. Indicators of the quality of a work is often judged by the specification that is more specialized field of knowledge on the higher quality.
b. Contribution of these works for the advancement of science in the field. This is often demonstrated by the works of the results of research and development.
c. Quality paper, especially of a scientific nature
should also be seen from the weight of the reference library is determined by
looking at the ratio of primary sources vs. secondary sources. More and more
use of primary sources, the higher the value of the work. Instead of excessive
use of secondary literature moreover will reduce the value of unpublished work.
d. Recency of material referred to should also have its own assessment. The use of reference of the publication 10 years also become a benchmark of the high quality of a work. Frequency refers to the work itself (self-citation) can reduce the quality.
e. Scientific impact include measure of frequency is referred to in other papers in his field. The more often referred to, the better the work.
f. Universality of the more overlooked than the locality especially nationalism.
d. Recency of material referred to should also have its own assessment. The use of reference of the publication 10 years also become a benchmark of the high quality of a work. Frequency refers to the work itself (self-citation) can reduce the quality.
e. Scientific impact include measure of frequency is referred to in other papers in his field. The more often referred to, the better the work.
f. Universality of the more overlooked than the locality especially nationalism.
Procedure for Preparation of manuscripts
Based on the
above guidance of a librarian to set up the work of analysis / critique through
the following activities:
1. Peruse the works that will be analyzed. Choice of
materials / works to be analyzed should be tailored to the expertise / skills
of people who will perform the analysis.
2. Under existing guidelines, a librarian can make an assessment whether a work meets existing regulations. Assessment is focused on the shortcomings alone but also on the excess as a masterpiece.
3. Assessment results are written into the new paper and formulated in the form of reviews, critiques, suggestions, or comments that are all aimed at improving the work.
4. The new paper should be re-examined its feasibility as a review / criticism / suggestions or feedback by asking whether the new content of the work that is useful to refine the work of librarianship which is the object of analysis. If it is not clear effort should be checked repeatedly perfected and improved for the new work is even more critical, decisive, and clear.
2. Under existing guidelines, a librarian can make an assessment whether a work meets existing regulations. Assessment is focused on the shortcomings alone but also on the excess as a masterpiece.
3. Assessment results are written into the new paper and formulated in the form of reviews, critiques, suggestions, or comments that are all aimed at improving the work.
4. The new paper should be re-examined its feasibility as a review / criticism / suggestions or feedback by asking whether the new content of the work that is useful to refine the work of librarianship which is the object of analysis. If it is not clear effort should be checked repeatedly perfected and improved for the new work is even more critical, decisive, and clear.
Conclusion
If we examine this paper, we can pull the following conclusion:
• The need for understanding the sense of analysis / critique the work of librarianship is the activity of reading and analyzing the work of others in writing or recorded information created new forms of writing in the form of reviews, critiques, suggestions, and feedback to refine the paper.
• Understanding of the guidelines to make the analysis of the paper to be clearly and correctly diketahaui following manner such as: title of the work, the agency publishers, editors, consistency of appearance, style and substance of the content of the work.
If we examine this paper, we can pull the following conclusion:
• The need for understanding the sense of analysis / critique the work of librarianship is the activity of reading and analyzing the work of others in writing or recorded information created new forms of writing in the form of reviews, critiques, suggestions, and feedback to refine the paper.
• Understanding of the guidelines to make the analysis of the paper to be clearly and correctly diketahaui following manner such as: title of the work, the agency publishers, editors, consistency of appearance, style and substance of the content of the work.
• The procedure for making a script analysis / criticism of the work was initiated: by perusing the standard guidelines for improving the professionalism and examined again.
• It is hoped that librarians are given wider leeway to obtain credit points in the execution of his duty, especially in the writing of the paper.
References
Haryono, Billy
Gito.2010. Website as a medium for dissemination of research
results area / study.
Indonesia. SK Menpan Number: 132/Kep/M.PAN/12/2002. The new
regulations functional position of librarian.
Mujiat, 2008. The Role Of School Library Penddikan Quality in Schools. Date
accessed 12 November 2009 at
http://sdpawyatandaha2kdr.wordpress.com/2008/01/25/peranan school quality educa tion to
the school library.
Surahman, Arif. , 2009. Law No.43 of 2007. Opportunities and Challenges for
Librarians. Final Paper Competition Outstanding Librarian Best DIY Provincial
June 29, 2009 in Yogyakarta Kagame building.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar